I do think the ultimatum interesting, and the fact that the EU and Churchillensky were not party to the deal. I think that tells a tale, too. Well, we have until Thursday to find out what is what. There have been maximalist demands before, but both Putin and Trump want an end to this. If they really do pull the weapons this of course pulls the plug on the whole scam. This would be pure kino.
Well, you were right about revelations of corruption undoing Project Ukraine. Bravo.
If you're right about the imminent collapse of the system, do you foresee tumbrils full of elites headed for justice, or will they simply be sidelined into a comfortable retirement?
I still have a hard time believing that the ruling elites' reign is over and that they will go quietly into the night. US media is still programming the gullible into hating Trump and his supporters. The recent election was a brutal reminder that roughly half the US is hopelessly lost, voting spicy ethnics, degenerates, and girl bosses into power. The education system is firmly in their clutches, and tens of millions of soon-to-be democracy enjoyers have flooded the US of A. A democrat victory in 2028 will make it officially "game over, man."
I don't think the liberals are going quietly, but are they going? It is a matter of time.
Why did the corruption come out now? It was there before the war, and was reported weeks before the war in detail. The US is backing the anti-corruption drive to undermine and pressure Zelensky. This is a real and serious change.
What do I mean by "going"? I mean the machinery of liberal democracy is largely intact but it no longer produces the standard result it was refined to produce.
What is this machinery and what was the result?
The basic problem of liberal democracy is control. You have an economic model with global ambitions which you will market as promising freedom, liberation and electoral power for everyone. This sounds like a recipe for chaos, as Matthew Arnold pointed out in the 1860s.
Using his solution, liberal democracies solved the basic problem by manufacturing consent for liberal governments through the use of mass media.
The second problem is at the top, not at the bottom. How do you control the elite in a system which is the rule by media of an elite? As is becoming clear today, you blackmail them, sometimes involving paedophilia.
Propaganda and blackmail work fine so long as you control the message everywhere. What has happened is the loss of messaging control, from the point of view of machine power. This has happened in my view because some elites in the US have realised the liberal system has bankrupted the West and it will collapse before it can secure global dominance.
There were two solutions to this very real crisis. One is to change and the other is to press harder for dominance before money (and time) runs out. This is an elite civil war if you like.
The downstream effects of this make for interesting times. One is that people in the liberal West now realise they are tax cattle in a system which reduces them and their lives to components and to commodity. Of course, this is sold with promises of liberty. We can all see what this has liberated us from, and into. Meaning and order have been replaced with babble and chaos, and everything in life gets worse and more expensive every day.
This means you cannot win elections by manufacturing consent because the reality people inhabit is so awful, and they know it was you - the liberals - who made it this way.
This leads to a questioning of the cult beliefs of the liberal system - the appealing novelty and aspirational pandering of its messaging. This means people now increasingly realise that "rights" replace what is right with wrongs, and that progress is leading to destruction. The obvious result of liberal ideology is national suicide, which is in fact the overall goal.
This is what I mean by the return to reality. Trump is not perfect, but the people writing his foreign policy are largely neorealists. This means they know the Russians are Russian and the Chinese Chinese, that they aren't us but like us have interests they must protect. This mutual recognition of (and attempt to reconcile) national interests means two things:
1. You base your strategy on the national (not internationalist) interest. This means nationalism, economically, tribally, and so on.
2. You understand other nations have these interests, too.
This is basic common sense. If you have no population you have no nation. And so on.
In addition, the concepts which have shaped our laws and policies - and our mass manufactured culture and its customs - are now all being questioned. The fact that a third of Gen X and Gen Z were aborted in America. The fact that abortion has risen by 63% in the UK since 2018. That this means nearly half of all babies in Britain were aborted last year.
This partners with a system which monetises consumer habits - addictions if you like - but whose refinement over time produces conditions which require the disposal of the unborn and the elderly to optimise consumer driven revenue. This kills the nation, so you import more cattle. Problems weren't, so long as you can control the messaging about how this new condition is better than the old one. "Diversity is our strength" etc.
That the claims of the liberals such as this are openly ridiculed today shows how bankrupt the system is. When I say it will dissolve I mean its politics, its ideas, the parties which it created to serve itself, and all the bullshit used to sell it.
You can see that the Epstein files are creating chaos. This too is a real crisis for the power structure. I think revealing them will be a profound shock to many people, as they are confronted with evidence that the people they admired and trusted - who become like their friends because they watch them on TV every day - are in many cases blackmailed with horrendous sexual material. This does not merely reveal a corrupt political and media and cultural(and even scientific) class, but reveals how liberal democracy actually works.
This is a disruptive moment in the political economy which comes alongside the inevitable economic crisis of a system fuelled by debt to wage war abroad and at home, in order to secure its own total victory. The cost is enormous of course.
What people are now realising is they have been living in a vast experiment on themselves, their minds, and their entire way of life financed by their record taxes and resulting in the collapse of their living standards - and ultimately the abolition of their already limited personal freedom. This means it is the end for this system. It does not have the hard power to win wars without the USA. It does not have the hard power to violently suppress its own populations into permanent subjection. Its plans for digital transition have been disrupted by the Ukraine war and have therefore not arrived on time. There is a rush in places like the UK and Canada to press ahead with this, but for several reasons I do not think this will work, and even if it did, it would not arrive in time to save the liberal elite from the fate it has unintentionally shaped by its own actions.
It will not be pretty, they will not go quietly, there will be bank runs and bond crises, threats of war and possibly attempts to promote liberal lawlessness and revolt. But whatever they do next will not restore the secret ingredient which made their machinery of power work - belief. This is gone forever, and soon, so will the liberals and their cursed ideology.
I think there is a real chance that Keir Starmer gets roughed up, and possibly even dragged out of his car.
He has united the nation in hatred of himself. Thanks to insane liberal policies, practically all of the armed police who used to guard the ministers of state have quit in protest. One of them was prosecuted for shooting a future scholar. Similarly, many soldiers have quit, as they do not also want to be prosecuted for having done their job by mad liberals and their activist lawyers. Keith, as we like to call him, was an activist lawyer of course, who led a case against Tony Blair's goverment over 20 years ago to secure the "rights" of foreigners to free money (our money), food, hotels, dentistry and healthcare etc.
When peace breaks out questions will be asked - screamed indeed - as to why Germany's economy was collapsed to support a war which has been lost.
Macron was the second most hysterical advocate of escalation behind the UK, which has been credibly said to have trained groups carrying out terrorist attacks in Russia, and which effectively led the doomed Kursk operation (for example).
These regimes are already despised and their support already low. They have all promoted a war which produced record inflation and for which no end of money was found whilst domestic populations suffer a deepening economic crisis.
The first time liberal democracy failed was due to its incapacity to solve economic crisis and to its effective and sometimes actual partnership with Bolshevism. This is a parallel for our times, as bankruptcy is allied with a horrendous agenda of the total destruction of our civilisation if we do not change course.
It is also an interesting time because it is usually the case that people commonly prefer not to think about politics or about abstract ideas. They now do so as these concepts are the ghosts in the machine which is demolishing their lives. This too is fatal to power, as once the masses find out how they are ruled they are apt to become a mob. In our cases this means the large scale recognition that the political class is a sort of cartel or faction, and so people naturally respond by forming their own.
In summary the demand for reality means hard right politics, which is a secular name for the closer correspondence of descriptions to reality. I would define the real "right wing" as inspired by a view of Man without illusions. People have had enough of illusions and spectacle. They want real things again, like being able to afford a home and a family, a real job perhaps, and a life worth living. This requires meaning, which cannot be supplied by rights and rainbows and blackwashed adverts. The basis of reality is God, of course, and this realisation is also inevitable as we recover from the cult of intentional deception whose conjuring trick has now been exposed.
My prayers on ending wars are always that the killing, dying and suffering at the hands of those in power stops. This is a good summary of the situation with Russia/Ukraine. I will also be sharing several memes...
If in fact this war is over, glory to God for the ending of countless deaths to young men (soldiers) on both sides.
Hopefully people are not deceived into believing that peace is brought in by the false light, and spiritually void Trump Regime, but rather the passive will of God.
The so called death of liberalism will simply rebirth a new form of it. Again, people, beware the deception.
I suspect the nefarious powers that be are intentionally collapsing the liberal regimes they have created and from the ashes the one world government alongside the diabolical one world religion will emerge to save us all…
The Russians have done well out of being disconnected from the parasitic liberal-global economic machine. It will be a hard sell to get them back into it, which I don’t think they will do. I think they will do trade and normalisation of diplomacy, because its sane.
The Chinese have cannily exploited it, making much of the western consumer economy reliant on cheap imports. This too is realised as a strategic weakness for us, and a strength for them. Carney of course runs a failed state effectively sponsored by Chinese and Mexican cartels - as the $10 trillion money laundering case proved last year (iirc).
I still believe that albeit there may be some rivalry and conflict between the various UN countries, they’re just playing their part in the pretence and ultimately they are all in it together. The top guys (US, U.K., Russia, China etc) will all have a seat at the table of the one world government. Instinct just tells me that this is the truth but of course it’s only my sense of things..
The 28 point plan is a joke: it reads like a brainstorming session written on the back of a fag packet during a lunchtime session with one too many pints.
Just scanning it I can see point '14' is the US stealing the Russian frozen assets rather than the EU. And '21' is a DMZ in what is considered Russia by Russia.
Sadly, I am afraid it is not the end yet. But the Ukraine army probably won't last much longer, so I hope the SMO will be over soon.
Putin has not agreed to that deal and why would he? He’s winning and that deal he didn’t negotiate requires huge compromises that he doesn’t need to make.
He added that it hasn't been discussed with the Russians in detail and that if Zelensky and the "warmongering Europeans" reject it they can expect more Russian advances - "If perhaps not as fast as we would like".
Putin said "this situation is acceptable to us" - meaning yes, they will continue to advance.
The warning that each deal which is rejected will be followed by a worse one for Ukraine was of course ignored. Trump has said Zelensky can "fight his little heart out" if he rejects it. There's a domestic majority in Ukraine now who want him out - and this with the media locked down and elections suspended. I think this is the beginning of the end. How soon it comes, and how it comes, is all that remains to be seen.
I saw that speech - yes it appears they based that peace deal on the original one he suggested in the early days of the SMO. Definitely the best one so far but not quite right with the 600,000 army, nato security guarantees and Ukraine being allowed long range missiles and the use of Russia’s frozen assess and the worthless legally binding bs. Otherwise closer 😝
The Economist has told Zelensky to reject the peace plan. The Economist is run by the Rothschilds. Now we know whose war it really is.
Pattern status: noticed.
I do think the ultimatum interesting, and the fact that the EU and Churchillensky were not party to the deal. I think that tells a tale, too. Well, we have until Thursday to find out what is what. There have been maximalist demands before, but both Putin and Trump want an end to this. If they really do pull the weapons this of course pulls the plug on the whole scam. This would be pure kino.
Worst is that all this data has been widely available to those with a functioning memory and reading comprehension.
Democracy was always a mistake, Plato and Aristotle were right. Socrates did nothing wrong.
Well, you were right about revelations of corruption undoing Project Ukraine. Bravo.
If you're right about the imminent collapse of the system, do you foresee tumbrils full of elites headed for justice, or will they simply be sidelined into a comfortable retirement?
I still have a hard time believing that the ruling elites' reign is over and that they will go quietly into the night. US media is still programming the gullible into hating Trump and his supporters. The recent election was a brutal reminder that roughly half the US is hopelessly lost, voting spicy ethnics, degenerates, and girl bosses into power. The education system is firmly in their clutches, and tens of millions of soon-to-be democracy enjoyers have flooded the US of A. A democrat victory in 2028 will make it officially "game over, man."
I don't think the liberals are going quietly, but are they going? It is a matter of time.
Why did the corruption come out now? It was there before the war, and was reported weeks before the war in detail. The US is backing the anti-corruption drive to undermine and pressure Zelensky. This is a real and serious change.
What do I mean by "going"? I mean the machinery of liberal democracy is largely intact but it no longer produces the standard result it was refined to produce.
What is this machinery and what was the result?
The basic problem of liberal democracy is control. You have an economic model with global ambitions which you will market as promising freedom, liberation and electoral power for everyone. This sounds like a recipe for chaos, as Matthew Arnold pointed out in the 1860s.
Using his solution, liberal democracies solved the basic problem by manufacturing consent for liberal governments through the use of mass media.
The second problem is at the top, not at the bottom. How do you control the elite in a system which is the rule by media of an elite? As is becoming clear today, you blackmail them, sometimes involving paedophilia.
Propaganda and blackmail work fine so long as you control the message everywhere. What has happened is the loss of messaging control, from the point of view of machine power. This has happened in my view because some elites in the US have realised the liberal system has bankrupted the West and it will collapse before it can secure global dominance.
There were two solutions to this very real crisis. One is to change and the other is to press harder for dominance before money (and time) runs out. This is an elite civil war if you like.
The downstream effects of this make for interesting times. One is that people in the liberal West now realise they are tax cattle in a system which reduces them and their lives to components and to commodity. Of course, this is sold with promises of liberty. We can all see what this has liberated us from, and into. Meaning and order have been replaced with babble and chaos, and everything in life gets worse and more expensive every day.
This means you cannot win elections by manufacturing consent because the reality people inhabit is so awful, and they know it was you - the liberals - who made it this way.
This leads to a questioning of the cult beliefs of the liberal system - the appealing novelty and aspirational pandering of its messaging. This means people now increasingly realise that "rights" replace what is right with wrongs, and that progress is leading to destruction. The obvious result of liberal ideology is national suicide, which is in fact the overall goal.
This is what I mean by the return to reality. Trump is not perfect, but the people writing his foreign policy are largely neorealists. This means they know the Russians are Russian and the Chinese Chinese, that they aren't us but like us have interests they must protect. This mutual recognition of (and attempt to reconcile) national interests means two things:
1. You base your strategy on the national (not internationalist) interest. This means nationalism, economically, tribally, and so on.
2. You understand other nations have these interests, too.
This is basic common sense. If you have no population you have no nation. And so on.
In addition, the concepts which have shaped our laws and policies - and our mass manufactured culture and its customs - are now all being questioned. The fact that a third of Gen X and Gen Z were aborted in America. The fact that abortion has risen by 63% in the UK since 2018. That this means nearly half of all babies in Britain were aborted last year.
This partners with a system which monetises consumer habits - addictions if you like - but whose refinement over time produces conditions which require the disposal of the unborn and the elderly to optimise consumer driven revenue. This kills the nation, so you import more cattle. Problems weren't, so long as you can control the messaging about how this new condition is better than the old one. "Diversity is our strength" etc.
That the claims of the liberals such as this are openly ridiculed today shows how bankrupt the system is. When I say it will dissolve I mean its politics, its ideas, the parties which it created to serve itself, and all the bullshit used to sell it.
You can see that the Epstein files are creating chaos. This too is a real crisis for the power structure. I think revealing them will be a profound shock to many people, as they are confronted with evidence that the people they admired and trusted - who become like their friends because they watch them on TV every day - are in many cases blackmailed with horrendous sexual material. This does not merely reveal a corrupt political and media and cultural(and even scientific) class, but reveals how liberal democracy actually works.
This is a disruptive moment in the political economy which comes alongside the inevitable economic crisis of a system fuelled by debt to wage war abroad and at home, in order to secure its own total victory. The cost is enormous of course.
What people are now realising is they have been living in a vast experiment on themselves, their minds, and their entire way of life financed by their record taxes and resulting in the collapse of their living standards - and ultimately the abolition of their already limited personal freedom. This means it is the end for this system. It does not have the hard power to win wars without the USA. It does not have the hard power to violently suppress its own populations into permanent subjection. Its plans for digital transition have been disrupted by the Ukraine war and have therefore not arrived on time. There is a rush in places like the UK and Canada to press ahead with this, but for several reasons I do not think this will work, and even if it did, it would not arrive in time to save the liberal elite from the fate it has unintentionally shaped by its own actions.
It will not be pretty, they will not go quietly, there will be bank runs and bond crises, threats of war and possibly attempts to promote liberal lawlessness and revolt. But whatever they do next will not restore the secret ingredient which made their machinery of power work - belief. This is gone forever, and soon, so will the liberals and their cursed ideology.
I think there is a real chance that Keir Starmer gets roughed up, and possibly even dragged out of his car.
He has united the nation in hatred of himself. Thanks to insane liberal policies, practically all of the armed police who used to guard the ministers of state have quit in protest. One of them was prosecuted for shooting a future scholar. Similarly, many soldiers have quit, as they do not also want to be prosecuted for having done their job by mad liberals and their activist lawyers. Keith, as we like to call him, was an activist lawyer of course, who led a case against Tony Blair's goverment over 20 years ago to secure the "rights" of foreigners to free money (our money), food, hotels, dentistry and healthcare etc.
When peace breaks out questions will be asked - screamed indeed - as to why Germany's economy was collapsed to support a war which has been lost.
Macron was the second most hysterical advocate of escalation behind the UK, which has been credibly said to have trained groups carrying out terrorist attacks in Russia, and which effectively led the doomed Kursk operation (for example).
These regimes are already despised and their support already low. They have all promoted a war which produced record inflation and for which no end of money was found whilst domestic populations suffer a deepening economic crisis.
The first time liberal democracy failed was due to its incapacity to solve economic crisis and to its effective and sometimes actual partnership with Bolshevism. This is a parallel for our times, as bankruptcy is allied with a horrendous agenda of the total destruction of our civilisation if we do not change course.
It is also an interesting time because it is usually the case that people commonly prefer not to think about politics or about abstract ideas. They now do so as these concepts are the ghosts in the machine which is demolishing their lives. This too is fatal to power, as once the masses find out how they are ruled they are apt to become a mob. In our cases this means the large scale recognition that the political class is a sort of cartel or faction, and so people naturally respond by forming their own.
In summary the demand for reality means hard right politics, which is a secular name for the closer correspondence of descriptions to reality. I would define the real "right wing" as inspired by a view of Man without illusions. People have had enough of illusions and spectacle. They want real things again, like being able to afford a home and a family, a real job perhaps, and a life worth living. This requires meaning, which cannot be supplied by rights and rainbows and blackwashed adverts. The basis of reality is God, of course, and this realisation is also inevitable as we recover from the cult of intentional deception whose conjuring trick has now been exposed.
I echo the comment “ great work, Frank. I also hope and pray your analysis is correct. I am getting better at understanding memes! haha
Menes :DDDD
Damn fine work chap. Thank you 🙏
Thank you Mr Horton - I do try not to be a waste of time lol
😁😁😁😁
The Frankly videos are also a delight. Thank you for those.
My prayers on ending wars are always that the killing, dying and suffering at the hands of those in power stops. This is a good summary of the situation with Russia/Ukraine. I will also be sharing several memes...
Great work Frank
My takes:
If in fact this war is over, glory to God for the ending of countless deaths to young men (soldiers) on both sides.
Hopefully people are not deceived into believing that peace is brought in by the false light, and spiritually void Trump Regime, but rather the passive will of God.
The so called death of liberalism will simply rebirth a new form of it. Again, people, beware the deception.
damnit. I don't exactly agree with the entirety of your framing, but that was, admittedly, very good. and thanks for it
I suspect the nefarious powers that be are intentionally collapsing the liberal regimes they have created and from the ashes the one world government alongside the diabolical one world religion will emerge to save us all…
The Russians have done well out of being disconnected from the parasitic liberal-global economic machine. It will be a hard sell to get them back into it, which I don’t think they will do. I think they will do trade and normalisation of diplomacy, because its sane.
The Chinese have cannily exploited it, making much of the western consumer economy reliant on cheap imports. This too is realised as a strategic weakness for us, and a strength for them. Carney of course runs a failed state effectively sponsored by Chinese and Mexican cartels - as the $10 trillion money laundering case proved last year (iirc).
I still believe that albeit there may be some rivalry and conflict between the various UN countries, they’re just playing their part in the pretence and ultimately they are all in it together. The top guys (US, U.K., Russia, China etc) will all have a seat at the table of the one world government. Instinct just tells me that this is the truth but of course it’s only my sense of things..
I agree
The dialectic must be maintained but the one world religion/gvt is definitely on the horizon imo.
The 28 point plan is a joke: it reads like a brainstorming session written on the back of a fag packet during a lunchtime session with one too many pints.
Just scanning it I can see point '14' is the US stealing the Russian frozen assets rather than the EU. And '21' is a DMZ in what is considered Russia by Russia.
Sadly, I am afraid it is not the end yet. But the Ukraine army probably won't last much longer, so I hope the SMO will be over soon.
Putin has not agreed to that deal and why would he? He’s winning and that deal he didn’t negotiate requires huge compromises that he doesn’t need to make.
Well Putin has said the text is a good start "I believe that this plan too could serve as a basis for a final peace settlement".
https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1991927410581762464?s=20
He added that it hasn't been discussed with the Russians in detail and that if Zelensky and the "warmongering Europeans" reject it they can expect more Russian advances - "If perhaps not as fast as we would like".
Putin said "this situation is acceptable to us" - meaning yes, they will continue to advance.
The warning that each deal which is rejected will be followed by a worse one for Ukraine was of course ignored. Trump has said Zelensky can "fight his little heart out" if he rejects it. There's a domestic majority in Ukraine now who want him out - and this with the media locked down and elections suspended. I think this is the beginning of the end. How soon it comes, and how it comes, is all that remains to be seen.
I saw that speech - yes it appears they based that peace deal on the original one he suggested in the early days of the SMO. Definitely the best one so far but not quite right with the 600,000 army, nato security guarantees and Ukraine being allowed long range missiles and the use of Russia’s frozen assess and the worthless legally binding bs. Otherwise closer 😝
Theres a better and full video of Putin's response somewhere but I can't find it.