9 Comments
User's avatar
Garland Remington III's avatar

Outstanding article! Simply outstanding!! Bravo! Bravo! All true. It’s going up on Facebook & Twitter!

Rich's avatar

You can't debate a libtard because they are devoid of facts and always default to Ad Hominem

They parrot the Marxist doctrine and propaganda and refuse to listen to reason

Petral Pedersen's avatar

Yes Frank, I want the days of debates, especially election debates to be over. Good choice for a heading picture. Poor Charlie. Why are they tearing him to shreds, even right after and still over a year after he was murdered?

Nakayama's avatar

Debate makes sense only when most of the audience are reasonable, logical, and knowledgeable. Very few of human organizations ever reach this state. As for national politics, especially US national politics, debate is useless.

Drake Tungsten's avatar

Violence is just debate by other means.

Patrick Kniesler's avatar

A friendly conversation which isn't pointed at finding truth is a fun fancy. You are stating that public discourse needs to be pointed at truth, whether that means solutions or anathemas. With no bedrock of shared values, you can't have any good outcomes of discourse. I'm definitely going to read the rest as it comes.

Sara's avatar

The paracitical class and their useful idiots are completely out of control!

Now this - we all know what "emergency measures" means so get prepared not to be obedient becayse they will impliment the Gulag of control and there was also no debate on the adding of folic acid in to flour which means near all we eat.

It is dangerous, especially to those with B12 deficiency and in long term use! There is a reason pregnant women only take it for 3 months!

https://youtu.be/2hdnCRLRZA0?si=yQm9ECqeUYoCfTFO

Sara's avatar

This has been known since 1940s - premeditated "democide"!

https://share.google/64ycwW2Z2msPwoQaA

Walter Egon's avatar

Heh! The most pithy and cogent bit of writing I've read in a long time -- with pleasure, because the blunt truth always pleases me.

I read Debord's Spectacle five or six years ago and was much puzzled and intrigued about what I was able to understand of it -- it's not the easiest of books to grapple with for a normal reader, but it pushed my abilities of perception at least a bit, and he wasn't wrong: What a spectacle we are living through!

Debates? With the spiteful, angry, entitled know-nothings? I'm too busy building a proper future :-) They can argue themselves into a blissful and righteous oblivion LOL