This one really has got to me Frank. Really has gotten right into my psyche. Just revisit it a few times. We have a government that allows criminals into our country and facilitates people trafficking and when they arrive such is their corrosiveness to society and threat they plead with them not to rape women and young girls via gov approved propaganda. Just think about how messed up that is. I don’t want to be part of a society that has implemented this. Really has depressed the life out of me. If me or you suggested these policies backed up some dried up old post gov has been wanting brothels - Currie, we’d be locked up. If we’ve got to tell people not to rape woman were done. Done. It took 250/300 years to get to a high trust society, which was far from perfect, to concentrate our minds on the evil we produced in GB and now we are actively, willingly and gleefully perpetuating it. A low point that never ceases to be surpassed by people we shouldn’t be anywhere near or them to us.
Yes Bertie it is deeply disturbing to discover the reason for the messaging ("refugees welcome!") is the business of trafficking to supply more consumers. In this process everything of value in our lives is consumed, including us in person at times.
There is an economic element to it yes. Unfortunately virtually all the money changing hands as a result is taxpayer money.
Even so, they are not refugees, they are not migrants, they are not asylum seekers. In every sense they are invaders, and need to be dealt with as such. Those that facilitated and/or benefited from their entry? Traitors, and need to be dealt with as such.
I'm sure our ancestors are looking down on us in sheer bemusement at the British people's complete inaction. Millions fought and died for our little island, and we're just quietly letting it be stolen from us for fear of being called racist.
Apologies for the rant. It's the fault of reality for radicalising me so.
Remember there are serious penalties attached to the accurate description of reality. Aside from tweetcrime, you can and may well face a social death sentence if you speak against the political economy of civilisational suicide.
Absolutely. That is why to the best of my ability I was careful in my wording. Although my social death sentence was already carried out years ago, and honestly I prefer the solitude.
I have only scanned through the post quickly but I believe I get the gist of it. It seems to capture the way I feel. Namely, as an octogenarian Whitey I am a native born Lancastrian who despite having worked on three continents retains an acute awareness of all that that inheritance entails.
This morning I heard a podcast, produced in England. One of the speakers was a man of Indian family heritage. He said that his grandfather immigrated to England from India in 1959. I have no doubt that he is a very decent and respectable man. However, I could soon tell that his values were different to mine. His message was that skin colour does not matter, it's "British values" that make you British. I disagree. My values make me revere English history, from very ancient times up to the present. I am currently reading the novel Ivanhoe, written by Sir Walter Scot. I take a keen interest in WWII, during which I was born.
In summary, I belong to the English tribe. That tribe is an increasingly diminishing subset of "the British", many of which can acquire their identity, as represented by their passport, in a very short time.
These elites don’t impress me. They’re jackasses in many respects. This is such a conflict of interest. On one hand they need Proud Britains and Americans to fight their wars. On the other they want to water down society to make it easier to control. Each one is in a high degree of conflict with the other.
Most NGOs are CIA fronts funded by US tax dollars, and they are instrumental in destabilizing Europe by helping “refugees” from former US war zones relocate to Europe.
Remember what a success story the regime change in Libya was? Or how about the failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
And what a success story the Ukraine war has turned out to be—and the war in Iran.
Hillary Clinton and the rest of the US bigwigs were big supporters of overthrowing Gaddafi. The result was entirely predictable: a massive surge of illegal immigrants pouring into Europe.
The same goes for Ukraine, the destruction of Gaza, the war with Russia, etc.
Europe is paying the price for it all in the form of higher energy prices, an increase in asylum seekers, and an acceleration of its demographic decline.
These NGOs are also instrumental in introducing speech codes, the surveillance state, digital currency, etc.
I agree and have gone on at length about the production of our culture and its partnership of domestic social revolution with wars abroad. Quite right. It is encouraging to see that Project Global Utopia is going up in smoke. Or drowning in debt, dying of a lack of belief, and so on. All’s well that ends.
Excellent Frank and thank you! Adding in my 2 cents worth or in England, my 2 pence worth.
1. Those handmaids look like old maids, fat, out of shape and of non-child bearing years.
2. George Floyd was a thief and drug addict. Arday was a fraudster and I have NO doubt we would have found out much more about who he was and what he was into. It must have been really bad to have committed suicide. 2 bad guys, no loss to society.
3. Police kneeling to a POS like Floyd is ridiculous and embarrassing. Kowtowing to lowest common denominators. Next.
4. Those who blame whitey can shove it where the sun don't shine.
5. The only thing sex with refugees will get you is STDs.
6. Adam Savas needs to be tarred, feathered and quartered. Rahimpur the same. Consider it a BOGO. (Buy one, get one free).
7. Sexual offenses need to be met with immediate castration with no anesthesia.
8. Time to be proud you are white, of your heritage, customs and beliefs. There will be no kneeling to anyone. Play nice with us and we play nice with you.
Great article, but I feel no discussion on this topic is complete without mentioning Peter Sutherland...Goldman Sachs banker, inner circle member of the global parasite class and UN Special Representative for International Migration 2006 - 2017. Advocate of unrestricted mass migration, this is the man who wrote the policy documents which are now being enacted in the strategic and economic interests of his Wall Street and City of London pals.
Nation states seemed like such a good idea in the middle of the 19th century, but the "international order" envisioned by people like Palmerston has devolved into a global crime syndicate. I'm sure the freemasonic heirs of Palmerston (when they can lift their faces out of the trough of sexual depravity and give it some attention) imagine they are chugging along the path to enlightenment.
Yes Macaulayism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. I think this here “international order” is not looking too clever these days. Question is, what next? I feel rather chipper about that mind you. Institutional evil is a low bar to clear.
I think we live in a time of immense change meaning the empire as was is no more, which means the state religion describes a state that is vanishing, and the global economic system which produced it is also unstable and perhaps terminally so.
The moment reminds me of a joke. “I never wanted to believe that my dad was stealing from his job as a road worker. But when I got home, all the signs were there.”
All excuses are equal and, as we have never sanctioned ANY level of immigration - in fact we have made it abundantly clear that we don’t want any of them and all political parties have promised to reduce immigration - they are all living in OUR homeland against our wishes; which means they are here unlawfully.
They are a collection of invaders, trespassers, burglars, thieves, thugs, rapists, and murderers. And the question that must be asked is: would anyone in their right mind invite such people into their home?
The answer is obvious, and as our home is synonymous with our homeland, none of them are living here lawfully.
We are constantly told that we must accept the law, and we do so. But the Common / Natural Law is the code that we live by, and we have done for over two thousand five hundred years.
However, legislative Acts of Parliament are NOT real laws; they are merely rules and regulations, and most of them have little or nothing to do with our Common Law.
Such regulations may only be imposed on legal fiction corporations - known in law as DEAD THINGS - and such rules cannot be imposed upon sovereign human beings who have nobody above them only God Almighty.
This is the reason that COURTS prosecute our LEGAL FICTIONS, and trick us into accepting responsibility for that LEGAL FICTION, eg: MR JOSEPH BLOGGS.
Therefore, we can decide for ourselves whether we wish to accept the conditions imposed upon us - BY OUR SERVANTS - or simply ignore them.
And when our PUBLIC SERVANTS attempt to impose their will upon us, we are not obliged to accept any responsibility for a LEGAL FICTIONS entity that was created against our will and without our prior knowledge.
Readers may scoff at this, but it’s absolutely true, and I and many others have proven this on countless occasions.
PUBLIC SERVANTS are employed to serve us and NOT oppress us. Where oppression begins, totalitarianism already exists. But most people still believe that we live in a democracy.
No totalitarianism government can ever be regarded as a democratic regime, regardless of how the controllers fiddle the votes.
In summary, we sovereign indigenous Britons will ultimately decide how our country - and not our people - will be governed.
That must start with the eviction of every trespasser, burglar, invader, being expelled from these isles.
I don't believe that British people think along Burkean lines. The Zulus and the ethnic groups associated with the movement you outlined, I would say, have a far greater sense of custom, history and heritage than most Brits. We're not the same, in other words. If any meaningful change is to occur, at any level, then folk need to start inhabiting those principles, which is far from straightforward given how much has been lost.
You have to understand what culture and civilisation are in order to defend it, and that has always been a minority pursuit. Others tend to pursue it once encouraged of course, and this is basically the mission.
Are you saying that British people are incapable of maintaining their cultural inheritance without encouragement? If so, I don't think it really works like that. The Zulus don't need encouragement, and that was my point. Once the line is broken, you can try to recapture it, but that effort will produce a manufactured, not organic result. A truly organic result will only be gained when something truly new is formed, and for that to happen, the mechanism has to die. Right now, the mechanism, although it is faltering, is also adjusting, as it tends to, and this takes people further away from knowing who they are, as per its design.
The British system of free trade extracts wealth and concentrates it: it seeks to remove all barriers to worldwide free flow of capital, always in pursuit of highest possible returns. With free trade, nations are obliged to compete for investment capital by systematically depressing wages, job security, pensions, health care services and education.
Other costs which cut into the returns on capital are infrastructure development, social spending programs and protection of the environment. Therefore, competing globally for investment capital entails progressive slashing of all these cost items, down to the bare bones. In that sense, British free trade system amounts to a competitive race to the bottom.
It favors production of raw commodities in bulk, lowers living standards, concentrates wealth in few hands, impoverishes the workforce and favors population replacement, militarization and forever wars. Its effects are discernible everywhere around us today, including economic decline, eroding standards of living, disappearance of the middle classes and uncontrolled migrations.
The wars in midfle eadt created immigrants that the jew controlled NGO helped to the West, to enforce sosialisme destruction of rights and to enforce DEI and the fucked up noahode laws, that the muslims support.
This one really has got to me Frank. Really has gotten right into my psyche. Just revisit it a few times. We have a government that allows criminals into our country and facilitates people trafficking and when they arrive such is their corrosiveness to society and threat they plead with them not to rape women and young girls via gov approved propaganda. Just think about how messed up that is. I don’t want to be part of a society that has implemented this. Really has depressed the life out of me. If me or you suggested these policies backed up some dried up old post gov has been wanting brothels - Currie, we’d be locked up. If we’ve got to tell people not to rape woman were done. Done. It took 250/300 years to get to a high trust society, which was far from perfect, to concentrate our minds on the evil we produced in GB and now we are actively, willingly and gleefully perpetuating it. A low point that never ceases to be surpassed by people we shouldn’t be anywhere near or them to us.
Yes Bertie it is deeply disturbing to discover the reason for the messaging ("refugees welcome!") is the business of trafficking to supply more consumers. In this process everything of value in our lives is consumed, including us in person at times.
There is an economic element to it yes. Unfortunately virtually all the money changing hands as a result is taxpayer money.
Even so, they are not refugees, they are not migrants, they are not asylum seekers. In every sense they are invaders, and need to be dealt with as such. Those that facilitated and/or benefited from their entry? Traitors, and need to be dealt with as such.
I'm sure our ancestors are looking down on us in sheer bemusement at the British people's complete inaction. Millions fought and died for our little island, and we're just quietly letting it be stolen from us for fear of being called racist.
Apologies for the rant. It's the fault of reality for radicalising me so.
Yes I blame reality too.
Remember there are serious penalties attached to the accurate description of reality. Aside from tweetcrime, you can and may well face a social death sentence if you speak against the political economy of civilisational suicide.
Absolutely. That is why to the best of my ability I was careful in my wording. Although my social death sentence was already carried out years ago, and honestly I prefer the solitude.
Doesn't bother me.
This is absolutely brilliant, Frank. Your insights and perspective on mass migration is unique and fascinating. Thank you!
That poster encouraging British women to fornicate with the savage invaders is sickening.
Tremendous and necessary read.
Not for me. As soon as I got to economics that primitive savages could help anybody I stopped, that's nonsense.
Then go away Mr. Nonsense.
I have only scanned through the post quickly but I believe I get the gist of it. It seems to capture the way I feel. Namely, as an octogenarian Whitey I am a native born Lancastrian who despite having worked on three continents retains an acute awareness of all that that inheritance entails.
This morning I heard a podcast, produced in England. One of the speakers was a man of Indian family heritage. He said that his grandfather immigrated to England from India in 1959. I have no doubt that he is a very decent and respectable man. However, I could soon tell that his values were different to mine. His message was that skin colour does not matter, it's "British values" that make you British. I disagree. My values make me revere English history, from very ancient times up to the present. I am currently reading the novel Ivanhoe, written by Sir Walter Scot. I take a keen interest in WWII, during which I was born.
In summary, I belong to the English tribe. That tribe is an increasingly diminishing subset of "the British", many of which can acquire their identity, as represented by their passport, in a very short time.
I disagree too. His culture is not English and could never be. And that is ok but keep it in India.
These elites don’t impress me. They’re jackasses in many respects. This is such a conflict of interest. On one hand they need Proud Britains and Americans to fight their wars. On the other they want to water down society to make it easier to control. Each one is in a high degree of conflict with the other.
Most NGOs are CIA fronts funded by US tax dollars, and they are instrumental in destabilizing Europe by helping “refugees” from former US war zones relocate to Europe.
Remember what a success story the regime change in Libya was? Or how about the failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
And what a success story the Ukraine war has turned out to be—and the war in Iran.
Hillary Clinton and the rest of the US bigwigs were big supporters of overthrowing Gaddafi. The result was entirely predictable: a massive surge of illegal immigrants pouring into Europe.
The same goes for Ukraine, the destruction of Gaza, the war with Russia, etc.
Europe is paying the price for it all in the form of higher energy prices, an increase in asylum seekers, and an acceleration of its demographic decline.
These NGOs are also instrumental in introducing speech codes, the surveillance state, digital currency, etc.
Know thy enemy.
I agree and have gone on at length about the production of our culture and its partnership of domestic social revolution with wars abroad. Quite right. It is encouraging to see that Project Global Utopia is going up in smoke. Or drowning in debt, dying of a lack of belief, and so on. All’s well that ends.
Excellent Frank and thank you! Adding in my 2 cents worth or in England, my 2 pence worth.
1. Those handmaids look like old maids, fat, out of shape and of non-child bearing years.
2. George Floyd was a thief and drug addict. Arday was a fraudster and I have NO doubt we would have found out much more about who he was and what he was into. It must have been really bad to have committed suicide. 2 bad guys, no loss to society.
3. Police kneeling to a POS like Floyd is ridiculous and embarrassing. Kowtowing to lowest common denominators. Next.
4. Those who blame whitey can shove it where the sun don't shine.
5. The only thing sex with refugees will get you is STDs.
6. Adam Savas needs to be tarred, feathered and quartered. Rahimpur the same. Consider it a BOGO. (Buy one, get one free).
7. Sexual offenses need to be met with immediate castration with no anesthesia.
8. Time to be proud you are white, of your heritage, customs and beliefs. There will be no kneeling to anyone. Play nice with us and we play nice with you.
Nuff said.
Great article, but I feel no discussion on this topic is complete without mentioning Peter Sutherland...Goldman Sachs banker, inner circle member of the global parasite class and UN Special Representative for International Migration 2006 - 2017. Advocate of unrestricted mass migration, this is the man who wrote the policy documents which are now being enacted in the strategic and economic interests of his Wall Street and City of London pals.
Thank you for that mention as I was unaware of Mr Sutherland and his philanthrophic endeavours.
Nation states seemed like such a good idea in the middle of the 19th century, but the "international order" envisioned by people like Palmerston has devolved into a global crime syndicate. I'm sure the freemasonic heirs of Palmerston (when they can lift their faces out of the trough of sexual depravity and give it some attention) imagine they are chugging along the path to enlightenment.
Yes Macaulayism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. I think this here “international order” is not looking too clever these days. Question is, what next? I feel rather chipper about that mind you. Institutional evil is a low bar to clear.
Do you? How? I feel extremely glum about our prospects.
I think we live in a time of immense change meaning the empire as was is no more, which means the state religion describes a state that is vanishing, and the global economic system which produced it is also unstable and perhaps terminally so.
The moment reminds me of a joke. “I never wanted to believe that my dad was stealing from his job as a road worker. But when I got home, all the signs were there.”
All excuses are equal and, as we have never sanctioned ANY level of immigration - in fact we have made it abundantly clear that we don’t want any of them and all political parties have promised to reduce immigration - they are all living in OUR homeland against our wishes; which means they are here unlawfully.
They are a collection of invaders, trespassers, burglars, thieves, thugs, rapists, and murderers. And the question that must be asked is: would anyone in their right mind invite such people into their home?
The answer is obvious, and as our home is synonymous with our homeland, none of them are living here lawfully.
We are constantly told that we must accept the law, and we do so. But the Common / Natural Law is the code that we live by, and we have done for over two thousand five hundred years.
However, legislative Acts of Parliament are NOT real laws; they are merely rules and regulations, and most of them have little or nothing to do with our Common Law.
Such regulations may only be imposed on legal fiction corporations - known in law as DEAD THINGS - and such rules cannot be imposed upon sovereign human beings who have nobody above them only God Almighty.
This is the reason that COURTS prosecute our LEGAL FICTIONS, and trick us into accepting responsibility for that LEGAL FICTION, eg: MR JOSEPH BLOGGS.
Therefore, we can decide for ourselves whether we wish to accept the conditions imposed upon us - BY OUR SERVANTS - or simply ignore them.
And when our PUBLIC SERVANTS attempt to impose their will upon us, we are not obliged to accept any responsibility for a LEGAL FICTIONS entity that was created against our will and without our prior knowledge.
Readers may scoff at this, but it’s absolutely true, and I and many others have proven this on countless occasions.
PUBLIC SERVANTS are employed to serve us and NOT oppress us. Where oppression begins, totalitarianism already exists. But most people still believe that we live in a democracy.
No totalitarianism government can ever be regarded as a democratic regime, regardless of how the controllers fiddle the votes.
In summary, we sovereign indigenous Britons will ultimately decide how our country - and not our people - will be governed.
That must start with the eviction of every trespasser, burglar, invader, being expelled from these isles.
I don't believe that British people think along Burkean lines. The Zulus and the ethnic groups associated with the movement you outlined, I would say, have a far greater sense of custom, history and heritage than most Brits. We're not the same, in other words. If any meaningful change is to occur, at any level, then folk need to start inhabiting those principles, which is far from straightforward given how much has been lost.
You have to understand what culture and civilisation are in order to defend it, and that has always been a minority pursuit. Others tend to pursue it once encouraged of course, and this is basically the mission.
Are you saying that British people are incapable of maintaining their cultural inheritance without encouragement? If so, I don't think it really works like that. The Zulus don't need encouragement, and that was my point. Once the line is broken, you can try to recapture it, but that effort will produce a manufactured, not organic result. A truly organic result will only be gained when something truly new is formed, and for that to happen, the mechanism has to die. Right now, the mechanism, although it is faltering, is also adjusting, as it tends to, and this takes people further away from knowing who they are, as per its design.
Well, that's a note for everyone who thinks the empire was great because the empire led us to this.
The British system of free trade extracts wealth and concentrates it: it seeks to remove all barriers to worldwide free flow of capital, always in pursuit of highest possible returns. With free trade, nations are obliged to compete for investment capital by systematically depressing wages, job security, pensions, health care services and education.
Other costs which cut into the returns on capital are infrastructure development, social spending programs and protection of the environment. Therefore, competing globally for investment capital entails progressive slashing of all these cost items, down to the bare bones. In that sense, British free trade system amounts to a competitive race to the bottom.
It favors production of raw commodities in bulk, lowers living standards, concentrates wealth in few hands, impoverishes the workforce and favors population replacement, militarization and forever wars. Its effects are discernible everywhere around us today, including economic decline, eroding standards of living, disappearance of the middle classes and uncontrolled migrations.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-212413612
Outstanding work Frank.
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
The wars in midfle eadt created immigrants that the jew controlled NGO helped to the West, to enforce sosialisme destruction of rights and to enforce DEI and the fucked up noahode laws, that the muslims support.
Noahide laws-bad news. On the surface, all appears nice and friendly, but underneath, oh boy.