17 Comments
User's avatar
Charles G's avatar

Tremendous and necessary read.

dicelexic's avatar

Not for me. As soon as I got to economics that primitive savages could help anybody I stopped, that's nonsense.

G Wooster's avatar

This one really has got to me Frank. Really has gotten right into my psyche. Just revisit it a few times. We have a government that allows criminals into our country and facilitates people trafficking and when they arrive such is their corrosiveness to society and threat they plead with them not to rape women and young girls via gov approved propaganda. Just think about how messed up that is. I don’t want to be part of a society that has implemented this. Really has depressed the life out of me. If me or you suggested these policies backed up some dried up old post gov has been wanting brothels - Currie, we’d be locked up. If we’ve got to tell people not to rape woman were done. Done. It took 250/300 years to get to a high trust society, which was far from perfect, to concentrate our minds on the evil we produced in GB and now we are actively, willingly and gleefully perpetuating it. A low point that never ceases to be surpassed by people we shouldn’t be anywhere near or them to us.

Frank Wright's avatar

Yes Bertie it is deeply disturbing to discover the reason for the messaging ("refugees welcome!") is the business of trafficking to supply more consumers. In this process everything of value in our lives is consumed, including us in person at times.

Bushwacked71's avatar

We are also supposed to believe that people from the poorest regions on earth have thousands of pounds laying about to pay people smugglers

Frank Wright's avatar

Yes. $5k to $15k per head if I remember correctly.

Bushwacked71's avatar

Someone is paying for their journeys, it’s clearly not them.

Andrea Nolen's avatar

The smugglers garnish their wages— licit or illicit— once the migrant reaches their destination. You are witnessing the metastasizing of organized crime gangs.

Jacques de Molay's avatar

There is an economic element to it yes. Unfortunately virtually all the money changing hands as a result is taxpayer money.

Even so, they are not refugees, they are not migrants, they are not asylum seekers. In every sense they are invaders, and need to be dealt with as such. Those that facilitated and/or benefited from their entry? Traitors, and need to be dealt with as such.

I'm sure our ancestors are looking down on us in sheer bemusement at the British people's complete inaction. Millions fought and died for our little island, and we're just quietly letting it be stolen from us for fear of being called racist.

Apologies for the rant. It's the fault of reality for radicalising me so.

Frank Wright's avatar

Yes I blame reality too.

Remember there are serious penalties attached to the accurate description of reality. Aside from tweetcrime, you can and may well face a social death sentence if you speak against the political economy of civilisational suicide.

Jacques de Molay's avatar

Absolutely. That is why to the best of my ability I was careful in my wording. Although my social death sentence was already carried out years ago, and honestly I prefer the solitude.

Christy Moorish's avatar

This is absolutely brilliant, Frank. Your insights and perspective on mass migration is unique and fascinating. Thank you!

That poster encouraging British women to fornicate with the savage invaders is sickening.

Tea and Neon Empire's avatar

Fantastic work! Essential reading.

dicelexic's avatar

Why not simply say they're primitive savages rather than that gobbledygook?

And they help employers? Don't kid yourself but don't try to kid me either.

Again: primitive savages.

Mark's avatar

The British system of free trade extracts wealth and concentrates it: it seeks to remove all barriers to worldwide free flow of capital, always in pursuit of highest possible returns. With free trade, nations are obliged to compete for investment capital by systematically depressing wages, job security, pensions, health care services and education.

Other costs which cut into the returns on capital are infrastructure development, social spending programs and protection of the environment. Therefore, competing globally for investment capital entails progressive slashing of all these cost items, down to the bare bones. In that sense, British free trade system amounts to a competitive race to the bottom.

It favors production of raw commodities in bulk, lowers living standards, concentrates wealth in few hands, impoverishes the workforce and favors population replacement, militarization and forever wars. Its effects are discernible everywhere around us today, including economic decline, eroding standards of living, disappearance of the middle classes and uncontrolled migrations.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-212413612

Luke's avatar

These elites don’t impress me. They’re jackasses in many respects. This is such a conflict of interest. On one hand they need Proud Britains and Americans to fight their wars. On the other they want to water down society to make it easier to control. Each one is in a high degree of conflict with the other.

Kelly McCulloch's avatar

My eyes are open to the Turkish culpability. I had thought Erdogan perhaps an ally to the disassembly of the New World Order. Good article; telling it like it is! Naked truth.